E! Online and other sources are reporting that Adrian Pasdar, who plays Nathan Petrelli, the lawyer-turned-senator who can leap tall buildings in a single bound on 'Heroes,' is being kicked off the show.Of course, this is rather strange news, as it isn't the character of Nathan Petrelli that's being killed off -- Nathan is already dead, murdered by Sylar in season 3. But Adrian Pasdar must've had one sweet contract, as he's since been playing Sylar disguised as Nathan, and now is more or less back to playing Nathan himself -- except that it's Sylar with Nathan's appearance and memories, with Sylar himself not having any memory of who he actually is. (Got that?)
Now, that rather convoluted plot element will come to a close. It's long been suspected that we'd be saying goodbye to some of the major characters on 'Heroes' sooner rather than later. The question is, why Nathan ... or why Sylar who thinks he is Nathan?
The answer is probably that Nathan's -- or rather, Pasdar's -- name was simply pulled out of a hat. 'Heroes' has been spinning its wheels for a long time now (has anything actually happened on that show since, oh, 2007?) and producers are looking for any hook to get the love back.
The move can be seen as an act of desperation on NBC's part -- which, of course, has everyone wondering if this is indeed the beginning of the end. Sure, 'Heroes' has killed off characters before, but Nathan's been with us from the start, in some form or another. Even in supposed death, he still has one of the most complex story arcs on the show. No more Nathan? What does this mean? Will 'Heroes' be canceled? Has the show painted itself into such a narrative corner that the only way out is to start killing off all the main characters (or their doppelgangers, or whatever you want to call it)? Maybe ... but that doesn't mean the show is preparing itself for the darkness.
Watch more full episodes of 'Heroes' on SlashControl
Here's the thing: 'Heroes' probably isn't going to be canceled. Everyone seems to think the show has "horrible ratings" now. It doesn't, really. The numbers may not be as high as they were during the first two seasons, but 'Heroes' is actually doing OK. And it's going to continue to do OK throughout the fourth season, and will probably be back for a fifth.
Why? Because it's 'Heroes.' And everyone loves 'Heroes,' at least a teeny tiny bit, whether they want to admit to it or not. Remember, everyone turned against 'Lost' for a while, too, and it got the love back (at least a little). The tide will turn for 'Heroes' as well. Wait and see.
Which brings us back to the (second) death of "Nathan Petrelli." What gruesome end do the writers have in store for him? How should he "die?" Hopefully it's going to be something spectacular and not something lame like Sylar suddenly getting his own memories back and just shape-shifting back to his true self.
What do you think? How will "Nathan" meet his doom ... again? And what does his (second) "death" mean for the show?
Related Posts
How Should 'Heroes' End?

Reader Comments (9)
donstillings at 7:22AM on Nov 4th 2009
Everyone on that show has died at least five times. It's hard to keep on caring about a character when nothing that happens to him or her is permanent.
tampatigers at 8:03AM on Nov 4th 2009
This will not be Nathan's 'second' death; it will be his 4th. Season 1 he got blown up, season 2 he got shot, and season 3 Sylar sliced him up. Personally, I think it's past time the character STAY dead.
jenmicmor at 8:28AM on Nov 4th 2009
Nathan's been in & out of the storyline for so long now, who cares? this article is completely pointless and unoriginal.
jenniemorris76 at 8:29AM on Nov 4th 2009
Nathan's been in & out of the storyline for so long now, who cares?
this article is completely pointless and unoriginal.
wevr at 1:00PM on Nov 4th 2009
So he and his dixie douche bag wife will be out of work. Must be Bush's fault. That's a shame.
jenniemorris76 at 8:32AM on Nov 4th 2009
(please disregard 2nd post- didn't realize that posted twice.)
Susan at 8:44AM on Nov 4th 2009
I don't think it really matters what character gets the proverbial axe, or brain sucked out or whatever. Heroes is a keenly written, albeit sometimes hard to follow, fantasy that lets us lose ourselves for an hour each week. With a seemingly new character every week if you can follow the story line, it keeps the show fresh. Losing one character from the core will sting, but we'll get over it. Just don't take away Sylar, the evil we love to hate! The fans of Heroes are fiercely loyal. The show takes it's viewers on a ride with as many twists and turns as a roller coaster. Just when you think you solve one situation in comes another person with another power-good or evil. Who can't find a soft spot for Hiro. He really wants to save the world. It's time for Nathan to go. He has outlived his storyline. He won't run for president, and even if he did, he was just another dirty politician in season one. No love lost. At least Noah is starting to act like a human being! (thanks for letting me ramble, it's been a long night, not much sleep! Maybe I'll go play the Heroes interactive on line!)
Monte Mendoza at 4:05PM on Nov 4th 2009
I'll continue watching "Heroes" even if Nathan leaves the show. I hope Charlie will remain on the show. She was a favorite from her first episode. I'd love to have her ability to remember. I also hope that Peter stays on the show too.
Torekelly@gmail.com at 8:19PM on Nov 19th 2009
I'll just be happy when Sylar is back. Peter seems fine with the one power thing, and hopefully Hiro will stop chasing love around. I love the show!